Consolidated Guidelines

Acknowledgements

This guideline was coordinated by Dr Maria del Carmen Casanovas and Dr Knut Lönnroth, with technical input from Dr Luz Maria De-Regil, Dr Ernesto Jaramillo, Dr Juan Pablo Peña-Rosas, Mrs Randa Saadeh and Mrs Diana Weil. This work was initiated as part of the general programme of work of the Department of Nutrition for Health and Development, and the Global TB Programme (GTB) in the World Health Organization (WHO) Geneva.

3.3.1.5 Molecular WHO-recommended rapid diagnostic tests for all other people living with HIV

The systematic review of the performance of an mWRD used to screen for TB among people living with HIV included 14 studies with a total of 9 209 participants (see Web Annex B, Table 16, and Web Annex C, Table 9). The Xpert MTB/RIF assay was the primary mWRD used in these studies. The prevalence of TB in the studies ranged from 1% to 26%.

3.3.1.3 Chest radiography

CXR is recommended by WHO to be used in parallel with the W4SS where CXR is available to assist in ruling out active TB prior to initiating TPT among people living with HIV who are on ART. The GDG agreed that, due to the increased sensitivity, the evidence supported using CXR in addition to the W4SS as a parallel screening strategy in which a positive or abnormal result on either screen would indicate a referral for diagnostic evaluation.

3.3.1.1 WHO-recommended four-symptom screen

The 2020 meta-analysis of IPD included 23 studies of 16 269 participants living with HIV, all of which reviewed the accuracy of the W4SS. The studies primarily focused on pulmonary TB disease. The unweighted average TB prevalence among participants within these studies was 9.2%, ranging from 1% to 26%; and 52% of people living with HIV screened positive on the W4SS. The sensitivity of the W4SS among all people living with HIV was 83% (95% CI: 74–89) and specificity was 38% (95% CI: 25–53).

4. Research priorities

During the guideline development process, the Guideline Development Group identified important knowledge gaps that need to be closed through both primary and secondary research in order to better inform the adoption of current IPC practices and, potentially, of new practices.

The general research gaps listed below are to be prioritized for all IPC interventions: