Consolidated Guidelines

3. Core components of IPC programmes

The threats posed by epidemics, pandemics and AMR have become increasingly evident as ongoing universal challenges, and they are now recognized as a top priority for action on the global health agenda. Effective IPC is the cornerstone of such action. The International health regulations position effective IPC as a key strategy for dealing with public health threats of international concern (70).

2.3 Respiratory protection

Respiratory protection controls are designed to further reduce the risk of exposure to M. tuberculosis (and other airborne pathogens) for health workers in special areas and circumstances. The recommendations given here are aimed at strengthening these controls, and preventing the inadequate implementation of respiratory protection programmes that may lead to a false sense of security and therefore increase the risk to health care staff.

2.2 Environmental controls

To reduce the risk of transmission of M. tuberculosis, air can be made less infectious through the use of three principles: dilution, filtration and disinfection. Environmental controls are aimed at reducing the concentration of infectious droplet nuclei in the air. This is achieved by using special ventilation systems to maximize airflow rates or filtration, or by using germicidal ultraviolet (GUV) systems to disinfect the air.

2.1. Administrative controls

A set of administrative controls is the first and most important component of any IPC strategy. These key measures comprise specific interventions aimed at reducing exposure and therefore reducing transmission of M. tuberculosis. They include triage and patient separation systems (i.e. management of patient flows to promptly identify and separate presumptive TB cases), prompt initiation of effective treatment and respiratory hygiene.

2. Recommendations

Evidence summary and rationale

The recommendations given below on TB-specific interventions are not envisioned as stand-alone measures; rather, they are components of a comprehensive hierarchy of controls, which in turn is a component of the overall framework of IPC practices, and depends on the adoption of a multimodal strategy. Thus, the adoption of several elements needs to be integrated.

Target audience

The recommendations presented here are intended to inform and contextualize TB-specific IPC interventions and activities within national-level and local-level IPC policies and protocols. Therefore, the target audience includes national and subnational policy-makers, including health system managers for TB, HIV and other disease programmes; IPC services; inpatient and outpatient facilities; IPC and quality assurance programmes; associations of affected groups; managers of congregate settings and penitentiary facilities; and occupational health and other relevant stakeholders.

Objective

The objective of these guidelines is to provide updated, evidence-informed recommendations outlining a public health approach to preventing transmission of M. tuberculosis within the clinical and programmatic management of TB, and to support countries in their efforts to strengthen or build reliable, resilient and effective IPC programmes.

Scope of the guidelines

These updated guidelines focus on a package of interventions aimed at reducing the risk of M. tuberculosis transmission, and they supersede the 2009 recommendations (7). Overall, the recommendations cover health care and other groups outside the health care system; also, where possible, specific remarks and additional considerations are given, to highlight specific areas or processes required for the implementation of these recommendations within health care facilities and other, non-health care settings such as congregate settings, community settings and households.

1. Introduction

With a burden of disease that accounts for more than 10 million new cases per year, of which less than two thirds are reported, tuberculosis (TB) continues to be a major global health threat (1).

Guideline development methods

These guidelines were developed in accordance with the process described in the WHO handbook for guideline development. ²² Confidence in the certainty of the evidence underpinning the recommendations was ascertained using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The Guideline Development Group, an international group of experts, was convened to advise WHO in this process, to provide input into the scope of these guidelines and to assist the WHO Steering Group in developing the key questions.